EROEI Explorer & Energy Policy Analysis
AP Environmental Science · Chapter 12: Nonrenewable Energy
Mission Briefing

You Are an Energy Analyst for New York State

New York has already eliminated coal from its electricity grid. Today, roughly 47% of NY's electricity comes from natural gas, with nuclear, hydropower, and renewables making up most of the rest. Petroleum products still serve as backup fuel for power plants and heat millions of homes downstate.

Under the CLCPA, New York must reach 100% zero-emission electricity by 2040. The Governor needs your recommendation: as NY builds out solar, wind, and storage, which fossil fuel — natural gas or petroleum — should be prioritized for phase-out first?

This activity has three parts. Complete each before moving on. Your full work will be submitted at the end. Use the 🔊 Listen buttons to hear any section read aloud. Hover over underlined gold words for instant definitions.

Part 1 of 3

What Is EROEI — and Why Does It Matter?

EROEI measures how much usable energy you get back for every unit of energy spent extracting a fuel. The higher the value, the more energetically efficient the source. If EROEI drops below 1:1, extracting the fuel costs more energy than you gain — making it useless as a net energy source.

EROEI = Energy Obtained from Fuel ÷ Energy Invested to Obtain It
Example: A coal mine uses 10 units of energy to extract fuel that yields 460 units → EROEI = 460 ÷ 10 = 46:1
This means for every 1 unit put in, you get 46 back — a strong return.

Click any fuel bar below to read details about it.


Question 1.1 — Calculation
A natural gas company drills a well that requires 50 units of energy to drill, process, and transport. The well produces 500 units of energy. Calculate the EROEI and show your work. Then, compare your result to conventional petroleum (EROEI ≈ 18:1). Which gives a better energy return?
0 / 25 words minimum
Question 1.2 — Interpretation
Oil sands have an EROEI of about 5:1. Conventional petroleum is ~18:1. What does this gap reveal about the economic and environmental cost of extracting bitumen? Use the word "investment" in your answer.
0 / 25 words minimum
Question 1.3 — Critical Thinking
If a fuel had an EROEI of 0.8:1, would it make economic sense to use it? Explain your reasoning — then give a real-world example of why a country might still extract a fuel with a very low EROEI anyway.
Think about oil sands, shale, or energy independence — why do countries extract fuel even when the energy math doesn't look great?
0 / 30 words minimum
Part 2 of 3

Environmental Trade-offs Across Fossil Fuels

EROEI tells us about energy efficiency — but it says nothing about the harm caused by extracting and burning a fuel. Below is real data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Nuclear is included for comparison — NY gets ~22% of its electricity from nuclear, so understanding its trade-offs matters for any realistic transition plan.

Metric Coal Petroleum Natural Gas Nuclear
EROEIenergy return ratio ~46:1 ~18:1 ~10:1 ~14:1
CO₂ Emissions lbs per million BTU 228 Highest 160 Medium 117 Lowest fossil ~12 Lifecycle
~0 operational
SO₂ Emissions SO₂ causes acid rain Very High Moderate Near Zero Near Zero
Particulate Pollution respiratory health risk High Moderate Very Low Near Zero
Water Contamination Risk High
Ash runoff, acid mine drainage
Moderate
Pipeline leaks, ocean spills
Moderate
Fracking fluid, well casing failures
Low chemical risk
High thermal cooling water use (returned to source)
Methane Leakage Risk Methane = 80× CO₂ potency (20-yr) Low Low ⚠ High
Leaks during fracking & pipeline transport
Near Zero
Radioactive Waste None None None High-Level
Spent fuel rods remain radioactive for thousands of years; no permanent U.S. storage site exists
Reserve Life at current global consumption 200+ years ~50 years ~60 years ~130 years
(uranium; longer with breeder reactors)
NY Grid Share (2025) ~0%
Already eliminated
~1%
Backup & heating oil
~47%
Largest single source
~22%
Second-largest source

Question 2.1 — Data Analysis
Some politicians and energy companies call natural gas a "clean" fuel. Based on the full table — not just CO₂ — is "clean" an accurate or misleading label? Cite at least two specific data points in your answer.
0 / 35 words minimum
Question 2.2 — Synthesis
Coal has the highest EROEI and the longest reserve life of any fossil fuel — yet New York has already eliminated it entirely. Using evidence from both Part 1 and Part 2, explain why EROEI alone is not sufficient to evaluate an energy source.
0 / 35 words minimum
Part 3 of 3 — Final Synthesis

Your Policy Memo to the Governor

The Prompt

New York has eliminated coal. Under the CLCPA, it must reach 100% zero-emission electricity by 2040. Currently ~47% of NY electricity comes from natural gas and ~1% from petroleum (which also heats millions of homes). As a state energy analyst, recommend which fossil fuel — natural gas or petroleum — NY should prioritize phasing out first as it expands renewables.

Your memo must: (1) state a clear recommendation, (2) support it with at least two specific data points from your analysis, and (3) acknowledge at least one trade-off or limitation. Minimum: 100 words. Write in a direct, professional tone.

0 / 100 words minimum
📋 AI Feedback on Your Memo
✓
Work Submitted Successfully
Your analysis and policy memo have been recorded. Nice work, .
🔬 Energy Analyst AI Tutor
Ask me anything about energy concepts — EROEI, fossil fuels, the NY grid, nuclear power, or how to approach your memo. I won't give you the answers, but I'll help you think through them.
Hi! What can I help you understand about nonrenewable energy today?